Monday, May 29, 2017

No one has issued a statement protesting against Cardinal Muller's error

No one has issued a statement protesting against Cardinal Muller's error



No one has issued a statement protesting against Cardinal Muller's error
We humans cannot know of any particular case of someone saved in invincible ignorane of Jesus and the Church.We cannot know of someone saved with the baptism of desire or blood, all without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.If there are such people they would only be known to God.
Neither can we say that someone in the past is a known case of salvation outside the Church.No one in the past could have seen an invisible person. And an invisible person cannot be an exception in the present times, to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).So every one needs to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation in 2017 and there are no practical exceptions.
MULLER AND ARROYO TAKE IT FOR GRANTED THAT THERE IS KNOWN SALVATION OUTSIDE THE CHURCH
However Cardinal Muller and Raymond Arroyo continue to assume that there are practical exceptions to the dogma EENS in 2017 or in the past. So there is salvation outside the Church for the both of them and this was indirectly expressed in the May 25 interview of EWTN The World Over.
They interpret Vatican Council II by assuming there is known salvation outside the Church and this is incorrect reasoning.It is irrational.It is bad philosophy.Common sense tells us that an unknown person in the past cannot be a known exception to the dogma EENS in the present times.Yet this was the deception of the cardinals in 1949 Boston and Rome and then again at Vatican Council II(1965) and the popes let it pass.No one protests against it even today.

THEY HAD A CHOICE BUT NEGLECTED IT
So Raymond Arroyo and Cardinal Muller repeated this error when they really had a choice. They could have interpreted magisterial documents without this contradiction, just as I do.Then they could accept 'the rigorist interpretation' of the dogma EENS( if they really wanted to) and a Vatican Council II which will not contradict it.
MULLER'S INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II IS FALSE, IRRATIONAL,NON TRADITIONAL WITH BAD PHILOSOPHY CREATING A NEW THEOLOGY
Cardinal Muller's interpretation of Vatican Council II was false, irrational, a deception and bad philosophy.It is non traditional and heretical.It is the false conclusion made with a false premise.He assumes that there invisible cases of the baptism of desire, for example, so there is known salvation outside the Church for him.We can see and meet people saved in invincible ignorance(I.I), without the baptism of water, for him, and so there is known salvation outside the Church.So every one does not need to enter the Catholic Church as a member is his false conclusion.Outside the the Church there is salvation he told Edward Pentin in the interview for the National Catholic Register when Pentin asked him about the dogma EENS.
No one protested after reading that interview.
No one protested since about every one assumes invisible cases are visible and so there is known salvation outside the Church.
Similarly in March 2016 no one protested when Pope Benedict XVI said that EENS was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century.Since for him there was a development with Vatican Council II.No one issued a statement saying there is no development with Vatican Council II since there is no known salvation outside the Church.There are no practical exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II to EENS ( Feeneyite) in 2016.So Vatican Council II (Feeneyite-invisible cases are only invisible) was not a development of rupture with EENS according to the 16th century magisterium.

NO ONE WILL PROTEST
Similarly no one will protest and correct Cardinal Muller's interview on May 25 when he indicated that the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) has to interpret Vatican Council II with the irrational premise.
This has to be accepted by all Catholics.


BISHOPS, CARDINALS AND TWO POPES ASSUME INVISIBLE CASES ARE VISIBLE
Since he and all the bishops, cardinals and the two popes assume invisible cases are visible in 2017.So the SSPX has to sign a document affirming Vatican Council II in which LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to known and visible exceptions in the present times to the dogma EENS, as interpreted by the missionaries in the 16th century.This irrationality is politically correct with the Left and Cardinal Muller and the rest of the hierarchy have made peace with it.
Like Vatican Council II, Cardinal Muller and Raymond Arroyo interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism.They assume there is known salvation outside the Church and invisible cases of the baptism of desire etc are personally known and seen in May 2017.So there are e known cases of salvation outside the Church.They are examples of people saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.This was also Cardinal Ratzinger's reasoning when he put together the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
SSPX WILL NOT PROTEST
The SSPX will not protest since they use the same reasoning to interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II, except that they reject the conclusion( Vatican Council II-Cushingite) while Cardinal Muller and Raymond Arroyo accept it.

FR.LEONARD FEENEY'S COMMUNITIES WILL NOT PROTEST
The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, the communities of Fr. Leonard Feeney in the USA will not protest since they too interpret Vatican Council II with invisible cases being visible.
The liberals and Masons will not protest since they approve of magisterial documents being interpreted with the false premise to create a non traditional and heretical conclusion.
So another year is to go by and the same error will be repeated once again.-Lionel Andrades

May 28, 2017
There are liturgical abuses and a lot of errors in the dogmatic sphere -Cardinal Gerhard Muller on the SSPX
eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/there-are-litur…

 

Sunday, May 28, 2017

It's simple.CCC 1258 does not contradict the dogma EENS ( Feeneyite) It does not contradict EENS as it was known to the magisterium and missionaries in the 16th century.


Image result for photo Catechism of the Catholic Church 1258 Photos
Comment/Question:

...interpret this in the light of Feeney/EENS and not Cushing?

CCC#1258 The Church has always held the firm conviction that those who suffer death for the sake of the faith without having received Baptism are baptized by their death for and with Christ. This Baptism of blood, like the desire for Baptism, brings about the fruits of Baptism without being a sacrament.
CCC#1258 The Church has always held the firm conviction that those who suffer death for the sake of the faith without having received Baptism are baptized by their death for and with Christ. This Baptism of blood, like the desire for Baptism, brings about the fruits of Baptism without being a sacrament.

Good question.
It's simple.CCC 1258 does not contradict the dogma EENS ( Feeneyite) It does not contradict EENS as it was known to the magisterium and missionaries in the 16th century.
Since baptism of desire and blood cases with or without the baptism of water are not visible and known in the present times. They are not part of our reality in 2017. They do not exist for us human beings. So they cannot be exceptions to the dogma EENS.
CCC 1258 is accepted as a hypothetical possibility.Speculation with good will but with no connection to the dogma EENS( Feeneyite).-Lionel Andrades
_______________________________________


Good answer.....another question....
have there ever been known to man anyone who was not baptized, and yet died for the sake of the faith?  If so, then would these people not be exceptions to EENS?  

have there ever been known to man anyone who was not baptized, and yet died for the sake of the faith?  If so, then would these people not be exceptions to EENS?  

I do not know of any such person.
This person would not be an exception to EENS. Since for there to be an exception in 2017 the person must exist in 2017.Some one from the past cannot be an exception in 2017 to all needing to be members of the Church for salvation.
-Lionel Andrades

There are liturgical abuses and a lot of errors in the dogmatic sphere -Cardinal Gerhard Muller on the SSPX

Tell me how close we are to the canonical recognition of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX? Raymond Arroyo asks Cardinal Gerhard Muller?(24:56) 
He replied ,"that we need a deeper recognition and not only the signing of a document because the doctrine of the Church is very clear.."
Image result for Photos of Raymond Arroyo talking to Cardinal Muller CUSHING AND FEENEYITE THEOLOGY DETERMINE DOCTRINE
At this point Raymond Arroyo was no where.
Doctrine of the Church is NOT CLEAR.Arroyo is not aware of the difference between Cushingism and Feeneyism as an interpretation of magisterial documents.So he kept silent. He did not discuss this issue.Cardinal Muller was not asked if the SSPX could interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.He did not ask if Archbishop Guido Pozzo and Archbishop Di Noia could interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism. What is the CDF/Ecclesia Dei position on this issue?

MULLER ACCEPTS VATICAN COUNCIL INTERPRETED WITH CUSHINGISM  
Now Cardinal Muller refers to a Vatican Council II interpreted with the irrational philosophy and theology of Cushingism.But then there are different doctrines. Without Cushingism we return to  traditional dogmas and the past ecclesiology.Vatican Council II needs to be interpreted with Feeneyism. The conclusion is different.I am sure this subject was not touched in the new book by Cardinal Muller published by Ignatius Press.He avoids this issue and leaves Catholics in ignorance.Since this is a doctrinal issue with political implications. 

MULLER INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II WITH AN IRRATIONAL PREMISE
The ecclesiology is traditional with Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) and this may not be politically correct for Cardinal Muller and the two popes.
"What is necessary for the complete, full communion with the Catholic Church..."
He meant that for full communion with the Catholic Church the SSPX and other religious communities have to intepret Vatican Council II with an irrational premise, whose conclusion is a Vatican Council II which is a break with Tradition, with the Syllabus of Errors and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite/ 16th century magisterium).

THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE CREED HAS BEEN CHANGED AND RE-INTERPRETED BY THE MAGISTERIUM
"Every one who wants to be Catholic has to accept the Catholic Creed..."
He means the SSPX has to accept the Catholic Creed in which it is understood that there are three or more known baptisms which exclude the baptism of water.Again the Creed has to be re-interpreted with Cushingism.

MULLER APPLIES CUSHINGISM TO ALL THE COUNCILS
He says that they have to accept " all the Councils",
He infers that all the Councils including Vatican Council II are interpreted by him with Cushingism i.e invisible cases are visible.Raymond Arroyo was still sleeping here.

SSPX HAS TO RE-INTERPRET THE SEVEN SACRAMENTS AND  BAPTISM 
They have to 'accept the seven sacraments' re-interpreted with Cushingism. Invisible baptism of desire is a visible exception to all needing to members of the Catholic Church with the baptism of water.This is the understanding of the Sacrament of Baptism. Invisible cases have to be approved as exceptions to Jesus' teaching on the necessity of the baptism of water in John 3:5.
Since there is salvation outside the Church for Cardinal Muller the seven sacraments are not necessity for salvation.

FOR MULLER THE CATECHISM IS A RUPTURE WITH THE SYLLABUS.THIS IS CUSHINGISM
They have 'to accept other doctrines' said Cardinal Muller.The Catechism of the Catholic Church too has to be interpreted by the SSPX with irrational Cushingism which makes the Catechism a rupture  with the Syllabus of Errors on ecumenism etc.

HIERARCHY ONLY INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II WITH THE IRRATIONAL PREMISE: EVERY ONE HAS TO FOLLOW
Cardinal Muller continued.He said that the SSPX " has to accept the hierarchical communion'.Of course, the hierachy only interprets Vatican Council II with invisible cases being visible exceptions to the dogma EENS.So it has to be a rupture with EENS as it was known to the 16th century missionaries. So for the hierarchy, the dogma EENS is no more like it was for the 16th century missionaries.Pope Benedict XVI clarfied this for everyone in March 2016.

BISHOPS WILL SUSPEND PRIESTs WHO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II WITH FEENEYISM
"There is the local bishop, and community of all bishops" the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith mentioned. He knows that these bishops will suspend any priest who chooses to interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.Priests are not allowed to interpret Vatcian Council II in line with the dogma EENS as it was interpreted over the centuries. Arroyo was naive or ignorant here.The hierarchy will not grant incardination to any SSPX priest who refuses to say invisible cases are visible and so there are no  known exceptions to Feeneyite EENS. Any priest, even a non SSPX priest, will be suspended if he said that the magisterium made a mistake in the Fr.Leonard Feeney case, since baptism of desire does not exist in our reality to be an exception to the dogma EENS.The Jewish Left will explode.

HERESY APPROVED BY CARD.MULLER CONFIRMED BY POPE BENEDICT XVI
All these errors and heresy are being maitained by the bishops and the SSPX priests and bishops.The SSPX and other religious communities  must tow the heretical line.This is heresy approved by Cardinal Muller and the two popes.It is official and public.Pope Benedict clarified it in March 2016.
The CDF Prefect who overlooks the heresies of Pope Francis said that the SSPX has to accept the Holy Father and a deeper reconciliation is needed.

RECONCILIATION TALKS HAVE ENDED : SIGNING OF A DOCUMENT NOT ENOUGH
He indicated that the talks had failed. There will be no reconciliation this year until the SSPX like the other religious communities comes across as a liberal with Cushingite theology.The Jewish Left will not shift from their position.The liberal rabbis decide.Heresy is now mainstream and they want the SSPX to also come in line.

MULLER LOOKS THE OTHER WAY AT POPE FRANCIS' HERESIES
The Holy Father rejects the dogma EENS and calls it triumphalism, he re-interprets traditional Cartholic Mission with Cushingism, he interprets Vatican Council II with the common false premise, conscience replaces objective reality and sin, so sacrilege and mortal sin is the norm with Cardinal Muller looking the other way.

MULLER ADMITS THAT PRESENTLY THERE ARE ERRORS RELATED TO DOGMA :DOES NOT SPECIFY EENS AND VATICAN COUNCIL II
"A deeper communion in the heart is needed," he said, "some of them are thinking that we are the right Catholics as we have been since 1962 and the rest is all abuses. This is impossible to say.There are liturgical abuses and a lot of errors in the dogmatic sphere,but we must overcome these errors and abuses and not justify the whole  separatism from the Church."
The fundamental issue of intepreting Vatican Council II with Cushingism or Feeneyism, with the hermeneutic of rupture or continuity was left out by Raymond Arroyo.
Edward Pentin
Edward Pentin a few years spoke about Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in an interview of Cardinal Muller and Archbishop Augustine do Noi for the National Catholic Register.Cardinal Muller and Archbishop Di Noia interpreted the Council and EENS with Cushingism.
Pentin did not say anything.
He seems to have got some warning. Since he refuses to touch the subject again.-Lionel Andrades



Watch the video Planned Parenthood does NOT want you to see.

They keep taking it down. We keep putting it back up. Watch the video Planned Parenthood does NOT want you to see.

Traditionalists/Conservative critics and Medugorje : bad fruit or innocent ignorance?

Image result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of Medjugorje

On a blog critical of Medugorje I asked if the following links, were examples of bad fruit or innocent ignorance.There was no answer.

Image result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of Medjugorje


Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Still River, MA accept novices who have to repeat the same irrationality as the liberal communities : approved by the bishop of Worcester

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/12/slaves-of-immaculate-heart-of-mary.html

Image result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of Medjugorje

MAY 21, 2017


Michael Voris had a choice and as always, he chose exceptions and compromise on the salvation issue

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/05/michael-voris-had-choice-and-as-always.html

Image result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of Medjugorje

 NOVEMBER 2, 2014


Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary are making the same error on Vatican Council II as the SSPX and sedevacantists

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/11/slaves-of-immaculate-heart-of-mary-are.html

Image result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of Medjugorje

How does the Council contradict Fr.Leonard Feeney at LG 16,LG 8,NA 2

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/11/how-does-council-contradict-frleonard.html#links,UR 3 etc?

Image result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of Medjugorje

Bad theology among traditionalists

Image result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of Medjugorje
Even the St.Benedict Centers whom Fr.Kramer criticizes interprets Vatican Council II with the same irrational reasoning.

Image result for Photo of Medjugorje
January 8, 2017

Michael Voris concedes that he has double standards on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/01/michael-voris-concedes-that-he-has.html


JANUARY 7, 2017
Church Militant - Serving Catholics

Michael Voris -double standards on extra ecclesiam nulla salus


Image result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of Medjugorje

SEPTEMBER 20, 2014


Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary (MICM),SSPX, Diocesan Bishops use Cushingism to interpret Vatican Council II- I don't

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/09/slaves-of-immaculate-heart-of-mary.html

Image result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of Medjugorje
January 31, 2017

Nick Donnelly and Michael Voris are teaching heresy and lay Catholics are following it 
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/01/nick-donnelly-and-michael-voris-are.htmlImage result for Photo of Medjugorje

February 1, 2017

Nick Donnelly and Michael Voris do not deny that they are teaching heresy and lay Catholics are following it.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/02/nick-donnelly-and-michael-voris-do-not.html


 Image result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of Medjugorje

JULY 10, 2016


Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary have been defending the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus theologically and not in ' a physical sense'http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/07/slaves-of-immaculate-heart-of-mary-have.htmlImage result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of Medjugorje

SSPX must continue to reject Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents interpreted with the false premise and conclusion ? : Church Militant TV still does not respond http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/04/sspx-must-continue-to-reject-vatican_25.html

Image result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of Medjugorje

School children in the Archdiocese of Detroit have to use an irrationality to interpret Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/04/school-children-in-archdiocese-of.html

Image result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of Medjugorje

JULY 9, 2016

The St. Benedict Centers are saying there are known exceptions to the dogma EENS,outside the Church there is known salvation, so they reject Vatican Council II for suggesting this
Image result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of Medjugorje

IHM schools teaching error

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/07/ihm-schools-teaching-error.html
Image result for Photo of Medjugorje

Fr.Leonard Feeney's communities like Peter Vere interpret Vatican Council II with an irrationality

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/07/frleonard-feeneys-communities-like.html
Image result for Photo of Medjugorje
Image result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of Medjugorje

Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary religious formation :no comment since last December

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/06/slaves-of-immaculate-heart-of-mary.html
Image result for Photo of Medjugorje
The Church is necessary for salvation. We agree here. But LG 16 is an exception to EENS for the MICM?http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/06/the-church-is-necessary-for-salvation.html
Image result for Photo of Medjugorje
MICM does not want to change its official position on Vatican Council II : need to break away from Hildebrand, Davis,SSPX
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/06/micm-does-not-want-to-change-its.html
Image result for Photo of Medjugorje
Image result for Photo of Medjugorje

Michael Voris, Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary are unaware that nothing in Vatican Council II can be an exception to EENS


http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/06/michael-voris-slaves-of-immaculate.html
Image result for Photo of Medjugorje

Cardinal Robert Sarah and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary 


Image result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of Medjugorje

Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary liberalism: same as Cardinal Walter Kaspar


http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/slaves-of-immaculate-heart-of-mary.html
Image result for Photo of Medjugorje
St.Benedict Centers - misleading
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/01/stbenedict-centers-misleading.html
Image result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of Medjugorje
It is a fact of life that we cannot see or know exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.It is not just my opinion
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/01/it-is-fact-of-life-that-we-cannot-see_1.html
Image result for Photo of MedjugorjeImage result for Photo of Medjugorje

SEPTEMBER 28, 2015

LG16,LG 14, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc are not exceptions to EENS : Fr.Leonard Feeney's excommunication was a mistake

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/09/lg16lg-14-lg-8-ur-3-na-2-etc-are-not.html


Image result for Photo of Medjugorje
Bro.Thomas Augustine MICM, Fr.Francois Laisney SSPX, Fr.Joseph Pfeiffer SSPX-SO and sedevacantists Michael and Peter Dimond assume that the baptism of desire is relevant to the literal interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Image result for Photo of Medjugorje


Church Militant TV's Simon Rafe and Ryan Fitzgerald will not answer : SSPX http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/04/church-militant-tvs-simon-rafe-and-ryan.html

Image result for Photo of Medjugorje
SSPX must continue to reject Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents interpreted with the false premise and conclusion : ChurchMilitant TV comment incomplete http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/04/sspx-must-continue-to-reject-vatican.html
Image result for Photo of Medjugorje

Fr.Robert Barron and Michael Voris like most people interpret Vatican Council II with the right hand side values http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/08/frrobert-barron-and-michael-voris-like.html
Image result for Photo of Medjugorje
Michael Voris has compromised and wants the SSPX to do the same

-Lionel Andrades