Sunday, April 30, 2017

Conference speakers and others can still now, ' one year after Amoris Laetitia' , 'seek clarity' on the heretical statement of Pope Benedict last March 2016.


Il direttore Cascioli con i relatori del mattino

"Seeing Clarity: One year after Amoris Laetitia."This was the subject of the conference  on April 22, 2017  in Rome.It was addressed by six Catholic laypersons.Amoris Laetitia undermines the Church's magisterial teaching on  adultery, mortal sin and the Holy Eucharist.1
______________________

Wednesday, March 16, 2016


Pope Benedict Breaks Silence and Affirms the Thrice Defined, Infallible Dogma, No Salvation Outside of the Catholic Church


"Council Cast Church and Faithful into a Double Crisis"  - Interview of Benedict XVI
(Rome) Pope Benedict XVI. has broken his silence that he  undertook in connection with his unexpected resignation. Since 2013 he has lived in retirement in the convent, Mater Ecclesiae in the Vatican. Now has given  Avvenire, the daily newspaper of the Italian Bishops' Conference a long interview, which was published in today's issue.
_________________________________
The six speakers did not say it.One year earlier in March 2016 Pope Benedict XVI undermined the Church's teachings on faith and salvation.He did not interpret the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with the traditional and common sense theology of Feeneyism.Instead he chose an irrational and innovative Cushingite theology.It made the dogma EENS a rupture with Vatican Council II. So for the pope and the CDF, there is no Vatican Council II and EENS , Feeneyite.Instead there is  something new.It is Vatican Council II and EENS, Cushingite.
Image result for Photo Nicene Creed
So the Nicene Creed and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Catechism of Pope Pius X,Catechism of the Council of Trent, Baltimore Catechism and other catechisms would have to be re-interpreted. They would be re-interpreted with hypothetical cases not being hypothetical.Invisible baptism of desire would be considered physically visible.Any reference to being saved in invincible ignorance would be a reference to a personally known case to someone.
Personally not identified cases of people allegedly being saved without the baptism of water in the past centuries would be postulated as explicit exceptions to the dogma EENS in the present times (2017).So St. Emerentiana and St. Victor of the past would be objective exceptions to all needing to be members of the Catholic Church in the present times (2917).Irrational' Fantasy theology? Yes but it is magisterial. Pope Benedict said so in public. 
Image result for Photo magisterial heresy
The inference of the two popes now is that not every one in the present times needs to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation.This was the past ecclesiology of the Church.

Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reaoning which says there are no known exceptions past or present, to the dogma EENS.There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.
 Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning, which assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.



 Image result for Photos Letter of the Holy Office 1949Image result for Photos Letter of the Holy Office 1949

 
I, however, continue to interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism. So there is no 'development of the dogma' for me.I accept all magisterial documents but unlike Pope Benedict XVI, I interpret them with Feeneyism.Our premises and conclusions are difference. Our faith and reason are also different.

 Image result for Photo magisterial heresy


For me Pope Benedict's  Avvenire interview was heresy.He did not as a pope and a Catholic affirm the dogma EENS and Vatican Council II with a rational theology.It was like when he once said that Jews do not have to convert into the Catholic Church during the present times but at the end of time, eschatological time.This was when he revised the revised Good Friday Prayer for the Conversion of the Jews.This too was heresy. He rejected the dogma EENS ( Feeneyite) and also Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).

Il convegno del 22 aprile
Was this not heresy for the conference speakers?.The pope's was irrational.So his conclusion was non traditional. It was a rupture with the past and he boldly expressed it in public.
He interpreted EENS and Vatican Council II with the hermeneutic of rupture and got away with it. No one protested. It was not even briefly mentioned on April 22 at the conference in Rome when a pope being in heresy was an issue.
Pope Benedict could have interpreted EENS, Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(first part) with Feeneyism and- he  chose not to do so.
The four cardinals who issued the dubbia on Amoris Laetitia said nothing. Since they too are Cushingites.
The SSPX and the sedevacantists said nothing on this issue. Since for them too Cushingite Vatican Council II is a rupture with EENS Feeneyite.They have no concept of a Feeneyite Vatican Council II being in harmony with a Feeneyite EENS.
 Image result for Photo magisterial heresy
Pope Benedict is in heresy on a de fide teaching of the Church.There is a rupture between his faith and reason.He may say that he accepts the dogma EENS but he refers to a Cushingite EENS.This is a new doctrine.It is  a rupture with the dogma EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century. He frankly disclosed this in public.
He was saying that his magisterium contradicted the magisterium of the 16th century.Is this not heresy? Boldly and bluntly he said this and no one in March 2016 asked if a pope can be in heresy and reject an infallible teaching of the past.Probably the conference speakers are doing the same thing.
Image result for Photo magisterial heresyImage result for Photo magisterial heresy
So the ecclesiology of the Church has been changed for him.It is different before and after Vatican Council II.This is what he said.The 16th century ecclesiology based on Feeneyite EENS has been discarded.It was done with the Rahner-Ratzinger new theology.This is the theology used at SSPX seminaries.They support an EENS and Vatican Council II, Cushingite.
Bishop Bernard Fellay does not tell Pope Benedict to interpret Church documents with Feeneyism( invisible cases are not visible) and then the ecclesiology in the present times,would be the same as in the past.
Instead when he made his announcement in March 2016 Church Militant, the blog The Eponymous Flower and others were praising him for 'breaking his silence'.They thought that the pope affirmed the dogma when he did not.

The conference speakers and others can still now, ' One year after Amoris Laetitia' , 'seek clarity' on the heretical statement of Pope Benedict last March 2016.-Lionel Andrades

 
1.
http://voxcantor.blogspot.it/2017/04/the-challenge-to-pope-francis-and_26.html


________________________________________________________



Video :NEWS NBQ17
https://youtu.be/YO7Vhvy9lUg





TERMS EXPLAINED

A Feeneyite does not separate the baptism of water from the baptism of desire.The baptism of desire will be followed by the baptism of water. Cushingite separates the baptism of water from the baptism of desire. The baptism of desire excludes the baptism of water.  I interpret the following terms with Feeneyism and the two popes and the cardinals do so with Cushingism (so does the SSPX).

I use Feeneyism and Pope Benedict XVI, Cardinal Muller, Bishop Bernard Fellay, Bishop Mark Pirvanus, Bishop Donald Sanborn and the sedevacantists Michael and Peter Dimond use Cushingism.For me the Baptism of Desire is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.For me Invincible Ignorance is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.For me Vatican Council II is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.  For me Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.For the Dimond Brothers extra ecclesiam nulla salus is Feeneyite but they reject the baptism of desire which is Cushingite for them. For me the Nicene Creed is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite. 

For me the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston is Feeneyite (in the first half) and for them it is Cushingite.

I avoid the New Theology, while they uses it. 

For me the Catechism of the Catholic Church is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite. 

The present magisterium separates the baptism of water from the baptism of desire. The baptism of desire excludes the baptism of water.I do not do so.

Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reaoning which says there are no known exceptions past or present, to the dogma EENS.There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS. 

Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning, which assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle hypothetical cases are objective in the present times. 

Baptism of Desire (Feeneyite): It refers to the hypothetical case of an unknown catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is an invisible case in our reality it is not relevant to the dogma EENS. 

Baptism of Desire (Cushingite): It refers to the known case of a catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is a visible case or the SSPX it is relevant to the dogma EENS. 

Invincible Ignorance ( Feeneyite): This refers to the hypothetical case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance. 

Invincible Ignorance (Cushingite): This refers to the explicit case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance.Since it is an exception to the dogma EENS it is assumed to be objectively known in particular cases.This reasoning is irrational. 

Council of Florence: One of the three Councils which defined the dogma EENS.It did not mention any exceptions.It did not mention the baptism of desire. It was Feeneyite.

Liberal theologians: They reinterpreted the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, as objective cases, known in the present times.They use Cushingism.
Vatican Council II (Cushingite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Cushingism.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer not to hypothetical but known cases in the present times. So Vatican Council II emerges as a break with the dogma EENS. 

Vatican Council II (Feeneyite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to hypothetical cases, which are unknown personally in the present times.So Vatican Council II is not a break with EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return, the Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite-one baptism),the teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the non separation of Church and State( since all need to convert into the Church to avoid Hell). 

Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston: It assumed hypothetical cases were defacto known in the present times. So it presented the baptism of desire etc as an explicit exception, to the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS.It censured Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center.Since they did not assume that the baptism of desire referred to a visible instead of invisible case.The Letter made the baptism of desire etc relevant to EENs.From the second part of this Letter has emerged the New Theology.It was Cushingite

Letter of the Holy Office 1949 ( Feeneyite): It means accepting the Letter as Feeneyite based on the first part,only .It supports Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.The traditional interpretatiion of the dogma EENS does not mention any exceptions. 

Letter of the Holy Office ( Cushingite): It is based on the second part of the Letter.It rejects the traditional interpretation of EENS. Since it considers the baptism of desire ( Cushingite-explicit) and being saved in invincible ignorance ( Cushingite-explicit cases) as being exceptions to EENS ( Feeneyite).It worngly assumes hypothetical cases are objectively visible and so they are exceptions to the first part of the Letter. 

Baltimore Catechism: It assumed that the desire for the baptism of an unknown catechumen, who dies before receiving it and was saved, was a baptism like the baptism of water. So it was placed in the Baptism Section of the catechism. In other words it was wrongly assumed that the baptism of desire is visible and repeatable like the baptism of water or that we can administer it like the baptism of water.The Baltimore Catechism is accepted with the confusion.It can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism.

Catechism of Pope X: It followed the Baltimore Catechism and placed the baptism of desire in the Baptism Section.It can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism.
Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite): It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins and means there is one known baptism the baptism of water.It is Feeneyite.
Nicene Creed ( Cushingite) : It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' and means there are more than three known baptisms. They are water, blood, desire, seeds of the Word etc.This is a Cushingite interpretation. 

New Theology: It refers to the new theology in the Catholic Church based on hypothetical cases being objective in the present times.So it eliminates the dogma EENS.With the dogma EENS made obsolete the ecclesiology of the Church changes. There is a new ecclesiology which is a break with Tradition.It's basis is Cushingism.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Feeneyite): It refers to the dogma as it was interpreted over the centuries.There are no known exceptions to all needing to formally enter the Church, with faith and baptism, to avoid Hell. 
 
Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Cushingite): CCC 1257 contradicts the Principle of Non Contraduction. Also CCC 848 is based on the new theology and so is a rupture with the dogma EENS( Feeneyite). 

Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Cushingite): It refers to the dogma but with exceptions.All do not need to defacto convert into the Church in the present times, since there are exceptions. 

Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Feeneyite): CCC 1257 does not contradict the Principle of Non Contradiction since there are no known exceptions to all needing the baptism of water for salvation. There are no known exceptions, since God is not limited to the Sacraments. 
When CCC 846 states all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church,CCC 846 does not contradict the dogmatic teaching on all needin to formally enter the Church. CCC 846 does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 which states all need faith and baptism for salvation.

Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Cushingite): CCC 1257 contradicts the Principle of Non Contraduction. Also CCC 848 is based on the new theology and so is a rupture with the dogma EENS( Feeneyite).
Council of Trent : A Feeneyite does not separate the baptism of water from the baptism of desire.The baptism of desire will be followed by the baptism of water.
Council of Trent : A Cushingite separates the baptism of water from the baptism of desire. The baptism of desire excludes the baptism of water.
________________________



April 18, 2017

Boston Heresy of the magisterium has practical consequences today : Abp.Corrado Lorefice interprets Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingism instead of traditional Feeneyism 

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/boston-heresy-of-magisterium-has.html


_____________________________________
April 16, 2017






 

Saturday, April 29, 2017

The new irrational theology is being taught at SSPX seminaries.It is used to interpret Vatican Council II.Contradicts Jesus in Mark 16:16

April 2017 - Letter to Friends and Benefactors #87 

 

Image result for Photos SSPX bishops heretics.
Luther's private judgment denies the need for supernatural authority and makes unity in the Truth impossible.
 
Dear Friends and Benefactors,
Five hundred years ago, Martin Luther rebelled against the Church, taking a good third of Europe along with him. It was probably the most significant loss that the Catholic Church has had to suffer during her entire history, after the Eastern Schism of 1054. He thus deprived millions of souls of the necessary means of salvation, separating them not just from one religious organization among others, but actually from the one Church founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ, denying its supernatural reality and the necessity of it for salvation. He completely distorted the Faith, rejecting its fundamental dogmas, which are the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, the Real Presence in the Eucharist, the priesthood, the papacy, grace, and justification.
At the foundation of his thinking, which even today is that of Protestantism as a whole, is private judgment. This principle amounts to denying the need for a supernatural, infallible authority that can impose itself on particular judgments and decide debates between those whom she is commissioned to guide along the path to Heaven. This principle, which is claimed explicitly, quite simply renders the act of supernatural faith impossible, since the latter is based on the submission of the intellect and the will to the Truth revealed by God and taught authoritatively by the Church.
Private judgment, set up as a principle, not only cuts off access to the supernatural faith which is the way of salvation (“He that believeth not shall be condemned,” Mk 16:16), but also makes unity in the Truth impossible. He thus established in principle for Protestants the impossibility of eternal salvation and of unity in the Truth. And in fact the number of Protestant sects has not stopped increasing since the 16th century.
Lionel: 'He that believeth not shall be condemned' said Jesus but the theology of Cushingism says there are known exceptions to this teaching of Jesus (Mk.16:16).According to Cushingism there are known cases of people saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church. These personally known cases include those saved with the baptism of desire and blood( visible) and in invincible ignorance( personally seen in Heaven or on earth). So according to the theology of the SSPX, since the time of Archbishop Lefebvre, every one does not need to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation. There are known exceptions.This is the new theology being taught at SSPX seminaris.It is the theology the SSPX uses  to interpret Vatican Council II.
On the other hand for me invisible for us baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are not an explicit exception to Jesus' teaching in Mark 16:16. My theology is not new and innovative. It is rational and traditional. I call it Feeneyite.
So for Bishop Fellay and for me our conclusions in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents will be different. Since our premises(invisible cases are invisible for me but visible for him) are different.
___________________________________ 
 In the face of such a distressing spectacle, who would not understand the maternal efforts made by the true Church of Christ to look for the lost sheep? Who would not welcome the many apostolic attempts to liberate so many souls locked up in that fallacious principle that forbids them access to eternal salvation? This concern for their return to the unity of the true Faith and of the true Church runs through the centuries. It is not at all new; consider the prayer recited on Good Friday:
Let us pray for heretics and schismatics, that our Lord God may deliver them from all errors and may deign to bring them back to our Holy Mother, the Catholic and Apostolic Church.
Almighty and ever-living God, who savest all and dost not wish that any one should perish, look at the souls deceived by the diabolical fraud, so that the hearts of those who err, having set aside all heretical perversity, might repent and return to the unity of Thy truth. Through our Lord Jesus Christ.
This traditional language leaves no room for the confusion that is so widespread today in the name of a false ecumenism. The warnings of the Congregation of the Sacred Office in 1949, following several papal documents, the most important of which is certainly the Encyclical by Pius XI, Mortalium Animos (1928), these fair warnings seem now to be a dead letter. Nevertheless, the dangers of this ecumenical irenicism, which was denounced by Pius XII in Humani Generis (1950), are immense and extremely serious, because it discourages conversions to Catholicism. What Protestant, seeing the “riches” and the “venerable traditions” of Luther’s Reform being praised, would feel the need to convert? Besides, the very word “conversion” is currently banished from the official Catholic vocabulary when it is a question of other Christian denominations.
Lionel: Since Bishop Bernard Fellay interprets the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation with Cushingism, there are exceptions to all needing to be members of the Church for salvation. So there is salvation outside the Church. So upon this known salvation outside the Church ( exceptions to the dogma outside the church there is no salvation), has grown the new ecumenism.The new ecumenism is based on the new theology accepted by the SSPX in the interpretation of EENS, Vatican Council II, Catechism of the Catholic Church, Catechism of Pope Pius X etc.
___________________________________
Furthermore this new attitude, made up of praises for Protestantism and apologies for Catholicism, causes the loss of faith in countless Catholics—this is an observable fact. Every survey inquiring about the faith of Catholics shows the ravages resulting from this frightening alignment with Protestantism.
Lionel: Bishop Bernard Fellay could turn things around and affirm all magisterial documents with rational and traditional Feeneyism.Then Catholics will once again have their traditional identity and not that given to them by the Left.
________________________________
 How many Catholics are affected in the 21st century by what the Church condemned, until the Council, by the name of indifferentism? A fatal error that claims that the whole world is saved, whatever one’s religion may be. An error diametrically opposed to the teaching of Our Lord Himself and of the whole Church after Him. Nevertheless, if someone denounces this error against the two-thousand-year-old Catholic Faith, he is immediately branded as a fanatic or a dangerous extremist.
Lionel: Theologically the SSPX supports this error with Cushingism.If there is known salvation outside the Church why does a non Catholic have to convert? And if one person can be saved as such then why not 100 or 1000 or more ?.
__________________________________
The new liturgy, too, was invented in the name of this new ecumenism. It has so many parallels with the Protestant Lord’s Supper that several Protestant theologians, for example, Max Thurian in Taizé, have been able to state that it is possible for their co-religionists to use the new Catholic missal. And during this time the children of the Catholic Church found themselves deprived of the most beautiful treasures of divine worship and of grace. Thank God, Benedict XVI courageously declared that the many-centuries-old liturgy had never been abolished, but—for more than 40 years, throughout the world—the postconciliar liturgical reform drove millions of the faithful from the churches, because they no longer found what they expected of the Catholic Church.
Lionel: However Pope Benedict XVI only permitted the old Mass to be said with the new ecclesiology, Cushingite ecclesiology which he defended with Fr.Karl Rahner s.j.He did not state that the old or new Mass could be said with the exclusivist ecclesiology of the past.Instead he opposed it.
In March 2016 he said that the dogma extra ecclesiam nullas salus was no more like it was for the 16th century missionaries. He did not say that we could interpret the dogma with Feeneyism and so there would not be a rupture with the magisterium of the 16th century. Neither is Bishop Fellay interpreting extra ecclesiam nulla salus with Feeneyism and in continuity with the missionaries of the 16th century.
___________________________________
How can anyone be surprised, then, that this ecumenism, which is supposed to promote the unity of Christians, makes but little progress?
Lionel: It is making progress in heresy while the SSPX support the new theology upon which it is based.
___________________________________
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, from the Council on, denounced this new way of dealing with the Protestants that took shelter under the name of ecumenism. In fact, this very elastic term expresses a general manner of seeing and doing that was introduced into the Church at the time of Vatican II. We are talking about an ostentatious benevolence toward all human beings, a determination to no longer condemn error, a search all over the map for “what unites us” rather than what separates us.... And what ought to have been only the first step in a journey toward unity, within the framework of a captatio benevolentiae [a rhetorical gesture to win good will], rapidly turned into a pursuit for its own sake that became an end in itself; an unending quest for an undefined truth. It then strayed from its objective purpose: the return to the Church of those who have lost unity with her. Thus the meaning of the word ecumenism was changed, the concept of unity was modified, and the means of arriving at it were falsified.
In the past, the Church knew that she is the only true Church and proclaimed it loud and strong, but this traditional clarity has been replaced by a new, uncertain doctrine—a mixture of apologetic self-denigration and post-modern relativism (for example, “we do not possess the whole truth”), which currently leads a majority of Catholics to reject the statement that there is only one way of salvation, and that we have it from Jesus Christ Himself that “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No man cometh to the Father, but through me” (Jn 14:6).
Lionel: There is now a vague Christology. We can see it in the interpretation of Vatican Council by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. This vague Christology-Jesus without the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church, is there in Dominus Iesus and Redemptoris Missio during the pontificate of Pope John Paul II.
_________________________________
The dogma “Outside the Church there is no salvation” has been changed surreptitiously by confused ideas, to the point of altering the statement that the Church of Christ and the Catholic Church are identical.
Lionel: The Church of Christ and the Catholic Church are identical if the theology is Feeneyism. However with Cushingism, Lumen Gentium 8 ( subsist it) indicates that there is a separation; there are known cases of separation and exceptions.
___________________________________
 Cardinal Walter Kasper, then-President of the Council for Promoting Christian Unity, saw the new definition of the Church (subsistit in; “subsists in”) as the thing that quite simply made possible the ecumenism that has been promoted since the Council. Coming from a figure like that, this is a fitting admission that should be taken seriously!
Lionel: His Cushingite theology is taken seriously by the SSPX. It is accepted by them and they do not seem aware of a Feeneyite theology in the interpretation of Lumen Gentium 8.There is an alternative and it has the hermeneutic of continuity but they don't know about it.
_____________________________________
That, in a few words, is why we cannot celebrate joyfully the 500th anniversary of the Protestant Reformation. Quite the contrary, we lament this cruel division. Following Our Lord, we pray and work so that the lost sheep might find again the path that will lead them safely to salvation, the path of the Holy Roman Catholic Church.
We pray also that this illusory irenicism will soon be abandoned and that in its place a true movement of conversion may be reborn, like the one that existed before the Council, particularly in English-speaking countries.
Finally, during this centenary of the apparitions of Our Lady to the three shepherd children of Fatima, we pray also that the requests of the Most Blessed Virgin Mary may be heard. She promised the conversion of Russia, when the Supreme Pontiff will be so kind as to consecrate this country explicitly to her Immaculate Heart. Let us redouble our prayers and sacrifices, so that the promise of the Mother of God may become a reality, without delay.
With her Divine Son, cum prole pia, may she deign to bless you during this Easter season and lead us all to eternal happiness.
Easter Sunday 2017
+ Bernard Fellay


APRIL 28, 2017


Bishop Fellay does not realize that he is confused between Feeneyism and Cushingism http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/bishop-fellay-does-not-realize-that-he.html



 APRIL 27, 2017




The dogma “Outside the Church there is no salvation” has been changed surreptitiously by confused ideas -Bishop Bernard Fellay

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/the-dogma-outside-church-there-is-no.html



http://sspx.org/en/publications/letters/april-2017-letter-friends-and-benefactors-87-29356

Laity in Palermo must appeal to Corrado Lorefice to follow Canon Law and affirm Church doctrine with a rational theology

April 29, 2017
Laity in Palermo must appeal to Corrado Lorefice to follow Canon Law and affirm Church doctrine with a rational theology
Image result for Photos  of Mayor of  Palermo with Archbishop
LAITY MUST CITE CANON LAW IN PALERMO
Catholics in the diocese of Palermo must appeal to Archbishop Corrado Lorefice citing Canon Law.Tell him to affirm Catholic teachings interpreted with the rational theology of Feeneyism( invisible cases are not visible).Otherwise he must leave the diocese.Also tell him that the laity will not any more affirm magisterial documents with the irrational theology of Cushingism(invisible baptism of desire is a visible exception to the dogma EENS) as he and his Curia does.They will not support lies and deception on such a grand scale. This is illegal in Italy.
Image result for Photos  of Catholics in Palermo
ARCHDIOCESE USES IRRATIONAL PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY
The Archdiocese of Palermo, uses an  an irrational and false theology to interpret magisterial documents.They will not use the theology of Feeneyism to interpret Vatican Council II, since then the Council will be in step with the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation ( Feeneyite).The Council will then support the old ecclesiology of the Church which states all non Christians and non Catholics are on the way to Hell unless they become members of the Catholic Church.This is contrary to the Masonic and one world religion supported by the political Left.
Image result for Photos  of Catholics in Palermo
NO DENIAL FROM ARCHDIOCESE OF PALERMO
Archbishop Corrado Lorefice of Palermo who suspended Fr.Alessandro M.Minutella, a Parish Priest has no denial to a report sent to him and other officials of the diocese.
The archbishop was asked to please affirm Catholic doctrine in accord with magisterial documents of the Catholic Church, including Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite).It is now confirmed.He is unable to do it!
Related image
JURIDICAL PERSON MUST AFFIRM CHURCH TEACHINGS

The statement e-mailed to him and posted on Twitter, Gloria TV and other media stated that if he cannot affirm the doctrines of the Catholic Faith as a Bishop, then according to Canon Law, he has no right to be a bishop.A juridical person in the Church must support the fundamental teachings of the Church.
He was asked if the Archdiocese could confirm if they have been teaching doctrinal heresy all these years supported by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the two popes.There is no denial from Palermo.
It was pointed out to him that as a Catholic layman I Lionel Andrades affirm the magisterial documents of the Catholic Church and it differs from him and that of the Cushingite Archdiocese of Palermo.
LAITY COULD AFFIRM MAGISTERIAL DOCUMENTS INTERPRETED WITH FEENEYISM
1.The laity could inform him that as Catholics in Palermo they affirm that 'All Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists and other non Catholics,Protestants, Pentecostals,Orthodox Christians and other Christians, atheists and other non believers in God, need to formally enter the Catholic Church with 'faith and baptism(Ad Gentes 7,Lumen Gentium 14 Vatican Council II)to avoid the fires of Hell and to go to Heaven .They all need to be incorporated into the Church with no known exceptions, according to Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14) and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus'.
Image result for Photo of people in PalermoRelated imageRelated imageRelated imageRelated image
ARCHDIOCESE MUST AFFIRM CATHOLIC DOCTRINE
2.The laity could tell him that as good Catholics and in line with the saints and Catholic Tradition in Sicily,' they affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) in which Lumen Gentium 16, Lumen Gentium 8, Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Nostra Aetate 2, Gaudium et Spes 22, Lumen Gentium 14 etc refer to  physically invisible cases; hypotetical cases and not people personally known in the present times.
So could the Archdiocese of Palermo also please affirm this traditional doctrinal teaching of the Church.The issue here is doctrine and not pastoral approach or theological praxis.'
LAITY MUST REFUSE TO INTERPRET THE NICENE CREED WITH CUSHINGISM
3.The laity of his diocese could tell him that when they pray the Nicene Creed at Holy Mass they mean that they believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins, one known baptism, the baptism of water.There are not three known  baptisms. The baptism of desire and blood cannot be administered like the baptism of water, they cannot be physically seen or repeated like the baptism of water.The baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are always physically invisible for us in 2017.' So the laity appeals to the Archdiocese of Palermo to please affirm the Nicene Creed with rationality and advise every one in the diocese to do the same.
THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE IS ALWAYS INVISIBLE, THEORETICAL AND HYPOTHETICAL FOR US THIS IS COMMON SENSE
4.The laity in Palermo must tell him that 'they accept the baptism of desire as being a hypothetical case, irrespective if it is theoretically followed by the baptism of water or excludes it.The baptism of desire is always invisible and never visible for us human beings.So it cannot be an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in 2017. An alleged possibility in the past cannot  be an exception to all needing to enter the Church with faith and baptism in 2017. This is common sense. This is also the traditional magisterium of the Church over the centuries'.
Image result for Photo of lay supporters of Palermo priest
CANON LAW MUST ALSO APPLY TO THE CARDINALS AT THE CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH
Canon Law should apply to the Archbishop of Palermo and the cardinals at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican if they cannot  clarify that they affirm the baptism of desire as being invisible and not visible.It  never was and nor is an exception to the interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This was how outside the Church there is no salvation was taught by the Holy Spirit and the magisterium in  past centuries.
LAITY MUST REFUSE TO ACCEPT HERESY
5.The laity must clarify that 'they do not affirm Vatican Council II with Cushingism, in which the baptism of desire is always visible and so it becomes an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is heresy.Yet this is the heretical doctrine being taught in the Archdiocese of Palermo.'
Canon Law must apply in the Archdiocese of Palermo  if the ecclesiastics cannot formally reject the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Cushingism and clarify this issue for their lay congregations and diocesan religious.
6.The laity must inform Archbishop Corrado Palermo that if he cannot affirm these teachings of the Catholic Church then could the archdiocese confirm it? Could they also confirm that they have been teaching doctrinal heresy all these years supported by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the two popes and so they do not expect the laity to continue with these errors.
Image result for Photos mistake
POPE BENEDICT MADE AN OBJECTIVE MISTAKE IN MARCH 2016
7.The laity must be aware that  Pope Benedict XVI made an objective error in March 2016 in the interview with Avvenire. They must ask Pope Benedict XVI  to interpret the Catechism and Vatican Council II with Feeneyism, even if the Jewish Left and the Masons do not like it.They must ask the two popes to  switch to rational and traditional Feeneyism( invisible cases are not visible in 2017, so there are no visible exceptions to traditional EENS as it was known to the 16th century missionaries).
Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reaoning which says there are no known exceptions past or present, to the dogma EENS.There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.


Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning, which assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.
 Image result for Photos Letter of the Holy Office 1949Image result for Photos Letter of the Holy Office 1949

POPE BENEDICT MUST BE SHOWN HIS MISTAKE
Pope Benedict needs to be shown that he made a mistake in March 2016, when in the daily Avvenire , he said extra ecclesiam nulla salus was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century.Since there was a development with Vatican Council II ( Vatican Council II Cushingite of course).


NO DEVELOPMENT OF EENS WITH THEOLOGY OF FEENEYISM
With Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Feeneyite) there is no development of the dogma EENS as it was known in the 16th century.
With the Catechism and Vatican Council II being Feeneyite there is no Anonymous Christian who is saved outside the Catholic Church.
Related image
LAITY MUST REFUSE TO INTERPRET THE CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH WITH CUSHINGISM
8.So the laity must ask the Archdiocese in Palermo to interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church with Feeneyism.They must assure the Archbishop that they will refuse to interpret the Catechism with irrational and nonsense Cushingism.
SCHOOL CHILDREN IN RELIGION AND CATECHISM CLASS MUST BE INFORMED ABOUT A CHOICE
9.Catholic school children in religion/catechism classes must be told that the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II can be interpreted with Cushingism( as is being done now) or Feeneyism and the conclusion would be different.
They must tell Archbishop Lorefice that they will not allow their school children to interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church with Cushingism.

ILLEGAL TO TELL A LIE IN PUBLIC AND ON A BIG SCALE AFTER BEING INFORMED.
10.The Archdiocese must be asked as Catholics not to lie.If Archbishop Corrado Palermo and the Auxiliary bishops of the diocese cannot affirm Catholic doctrines interpreted with rationality then for the sake of unity in the diocese, they could resign and not lie.It is a deception and a falsehood to support the theology of Cushingism after being informed. This would then be a secular and legal issue.Telling a lie and deception in public  on a big scale, intentionally and with full knowledge, is prohibited according to Italian law.-Lionel Andrades
 April 28, 2017
It is confirmed at the Archdiocese of Palermo, Italy they use an irrational and false theology to interpret magisterial documents : Canon Law must apply