Sunday, February 2, 2014

SSPX District Superior Italy makes the same factual error as Muller, Ladaria, Di Noi, Pozzo, Kaspar and Koch

Father Pierpaolo Petrucci, the District Superior of the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX), Albano, Italy  has made the same factual error on Vatican Council II as Muller, Ladaria, Di Noi, Pozzo, Kaspar and Koch.
 
In an article on extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Vatican Council II and the loss of the missionary spirit in the Catholic Church (1) , he assumes imperfect communion with the Church (UR 3) and good and holy things in other religions (NA 2) are explicit for us, known in reality, visible in the flesh,defacto and objective. So for him Vatican Council II contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with UR 3, NA 2 etc.
Then he will not affirm the traditional position on extra ecclesiam nulla salus since he assumes that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are  explicit for us, known in reality, visible in the flesh,defacto and objective. They would have to be all these qualities for them to be visible exceptions to the need for all to convert into the Church since outside the Church there is no salvation.

So the Italian District Superior denies the traditional interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus because of visible, defacto exceptions in 2011, 2012. Then he assumes that Vatican Council II contradicts the traditional interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus, again because of the right hand side column  values.
 
This is the same error made by cardinals and archbishops in the Vatican Curia.
All salvation referred to in Vatican Council II i.e saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16), imperfect communion with the Church (UR 3),seeds of the Word (AG 11), good and holy things in other religions (NA 2) etc are either:

implicit                      or    explicit for us.

hypothetical             or    known in reality.

invisible                    or     visible in the flesh.

dejure ( in principle) or     defacto ( in fact ).

subjective                  or     objective.

So one can choose from the left hand side or the right hand side column.

If the right hand side column is chosen then Vatican Council II contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors and Tradition in general on other religions and Christian communities and churches. There are known exceptions in 2014 to the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Cathlic Church. The dead- saved are visible.

If the left hand side column is chosen then Vatican Council II does not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus, nor Tradition on other religions and Christian communities and churches.

Most people interpret Vatican Council II with the right hand side values.

So the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance was never ever an exception to the literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney, unless one is using the right hand side column.There were and are no known exceptions.
 
-Lionel Andrades
 
1.
Atti del XX Convegno di Studi Cattolici, Rimini 2012. Concilio Vaticano II e la salvezza delle anime, la morte dello spirit missionario  di Don Pierpaolo Petrucci pp.39-58. Published by Fraternita Sacredotale San Pio X in collaboration with La Tradizione Cattolica.
p.39 Fuori dellaChiesa non c'e salvezza.
p.47. Gli errori penetrati nel Concilio.
p.49. Unitatis Redintigratio
p.51. Nostra Aetate 2
 
 

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/02/muller-ladaria-di-noi-pozzo-kaspar-and.html#links

http://www.sanpiox.it/public/

http://www.sanpiox.it/public/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1229:il-papa-chiude-la-settimana-per-l-unita-dei-cristiani&catid=64&Itemid=81