Newman Theological College, Canada and the Vatican Curia use an irrationality in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and this cannot be magisterial.It cannot be the teaching of the Holy Spirit.
How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake?
How can the Holy Spirit suggest that there are hypothetical cases which are objectively visible? And then how can the Holy Spirit infer that these visible cases in Heaven are exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).
Yet this is how the Newman Theological College(NTC) and the Vatican Curia interpret LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc.
Being saved in 'imperfect communion with the Church'(UR 3) refers to an objective case, objectively seen in the present times for them.So it is an exception to the old exclusivist ecclesiology, which they reject.This is how Wikipedia interprets LG 16 ( See Fr.Leonard Feeney/extra ecclesiam nulla salus).
This interpretation cannot be magisterial.
It is a human innovation which has come into the Catholic Church through the Baltimore Catechism.The American bishops approved it.They also approved the error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.The Letter to the Archbishop of Boston 1949 was made public by the Archdiocese some three years after it was privately dispatched to the Archbishop,Richard Cushing.
It is a human innovation which has come into the Catholic Church through the Baltimore Catechism.The American bishops approved it.They also approved the error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.The Letter to the Archbishop of Boston 1949 was made public by the Archdiocese some three years after it was privately dispatched to the Archbishop,Richard Cushing.
Being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire had nothing to do with the dogma EENS or the baptism of water.Yet they are made relevant in the 1949 Letter from the magisterium in Rome.This error was then inserted into Vatican Council II.
Why did Vatican Council II have to refer to being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire?
Now NTC and the Vatican Curia assume being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire 1) are explicit, objectively seen in the flesh and 2) they are objective exceptions, to all needing to formally enter the Catholic Church for salvation.
This is objectively false, it is fantasy theology, it is based on an irrationality.
It cannot also be magisterial since it contradicts the centuries old magisterium on outside the Church there is no salvation (EENS).
NTC and the Vatican Curia consider it magisterial when they have used a false premise( people in Heaven are physically visible without the baptism of water) and inference ( these visible cases are objective exceptions to all needing to formally enter the Church for salvation) to produce a non traditional conclusion( Vatican Council II contradicts Tradition ).
FOR ME
I assume hypothetical cases are hypothetical and not objective.So they are not relevant to the old ecclesiology as exceptions. I accept Vatican Council II with no exceptions to EENS.
Since there are no exceptions to EENS there is no change in the traditional ecclesiology of the Church.This is the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church supported by the Holy Spirit.It is magisterial.
So I am affirming the official teachings of the Church according to the magisterium, according to magisterial texts and documents (Vatican Council II,Catechism of the Catholic Church 1257,845,846, Council of Trent, Cantate Dominio, Council of Florence etc) .
The Vatican Curia and NTC are a break with the traditional magisterium, they are also irrational and have based their theology on a lie ( there are visible persons in Heaven without the baptism of water).
They are not magisterial since they can only affirm the official teachings of the Church according to magisterial texts and documents, interpretated with an irrational premise and inference (Vatican Council II, Catechism of the Catholic Church 1257,845,846, Council of Trent, Cantate Dominio, Council of Florence etc).They have to use an irrationality to interpret these magisterial documents as a break with EENS.This cannot be the teaching of the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit cannot teach a lie or make an objective error.
-Lionel Andrades
It cannot also be magisterial since it contradicts the centuries old magisterium on outside the Church there is no salvation (EENS).
NTC and the Vatican Curia consider it magisterial when they have used a false premise( people in Heaven are physically visible without the baptism of water) and inference ( these visible cases are objective exceptions to all needing to formally enter the Church for salvation) to produce a non traditional conclusion( Vatican Council II contradicts Tradition ).
FOR ME
I assume hypothetical cases are hypothetical and not objective.So they are not relevant to the old ecclesiology as exceptions. I accept Vatican Council II with no exceptions to EENS.
Since there are no exceptions to EENS there is no change in the traditional ecclesiology of the Church.This is the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church supported by the Holy Spirit.It is magisterial.
So I am affirming the official teachings of the Church according to the magisterium, according to magisterial texts and documents (Vatican Council II,Catechism of the Catholic Church 1257,845,846, Council of Trent, Cantate Dominio, Council of Florence etc) .
The Vatican Curia and NTC are a break with the traditional magisterium, they are also irrational and have based their theology on a lie ( there are visible persons in Heaven without the baptism of water).
They are not magisterial since they can only affirm the official teachings of the Church according to magisterial texts and documents, interpretated with an irrational premise and inference (Vatican Council II, Catechism of the Catholic Church 1257,845,846, Council of Trent, Cantate Dominio, Council of Florence etc).They have to use an irrationality to interpret these magisterial documents as a break with EENS.This cannot be the teaching of the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit cannot teach a lie or make an objective error.
-Lionel Andrades
Catholic Theological College in Canada also uses irrational Cushingism instead of traditional Feeneyism as a theology to interpret Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/02/catholic-theological-college-in-canada.htmlPakistani Catholic seminary uses irrational theology to interpret Vatican Council II http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/02/pakistani-catholic-seminary-uses.html
Catholic Theological College in Canada also uses irrational Cushingism instead of traditional Feeneyism as a theology to interpret Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/02/catholic-theological-college-in-canada.html
Ave Maria University like the sedevacantist seminary in Florida uses irrational Cushingism instead of traditional Feeneyism to interpret Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/02/ave-maria-university-like-sedevacantist.html
Florida seminaries and universities unaware: Vatican Council II can be interpreted with the theology of Feeneyism or Cushingism
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/02/florida-seminaries-and-universities.html