So when will CMTV comment on this ? Can they really comment on this when they often mention salvation?

A stellar example is his false claim that "we have a reasonable hope that all men are saved," a notion he repeats from a Swiss theologian, Hans Urs von Balthasar of the 20th century. Von Balthasar had been ordained a Jesuit, but later left the order after beginning work with a Protestant woman claiming to be a mystic. So convoluted is his thought on this that well-known Dr. Ralph Martin, who teaches at Sacred Heart Major Seminary in Detroit, Michigan, had to write an entire book dismantling von Balthasar's spurious opinions.-Michael Voris 

http://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/bp.-robert-barrons-spiritual-poison

When Bishop Barron says  that "we have a reasonable hope that all men are saved," he is referring to Vatican Council II (Cushingite).

Dr.Ralph Martin has a reasonable hope that some are saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire, outside the Church, without 'faith and baptism'. He too is dependent on Vatican Council II (Cushingite).Cushingite theology is based on invisible cases being visible in the present times.

When will Church Militant address this issue?

When Christine Niles cited the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 as an exception to Cantate Dominio, Council of Florence 1441 on the Mic' Up program, she was firmly fixed in Vatican Council II (Cushingite).The 1949 Letter is Cushingite. It assumes that the baptism of desire etc,without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church,  was a known exception to Feeneyite EENS. This became magisterial. This irrational reasoning was included in Vatican Council II (LG 16, AG 7, LG 14 etc).

When Michael Voris on a Vortex program said not every one needs to be a card carrying member of the Church his foundation was the irregular and strange theology of Vatican Council II (Cushingism).The baptism of desire(Cushigite) is an exception to EENS(Feeneyite).So every one does not need to be a card carrying member of the Church.

I interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.

Since there are no known cases of the baptism of desire and since being saved in invincible ignorance is also a personally unknown case, which is invisible in 2017, Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) says 'all' Jews, Muslims etc need 'faith and baptism' for salvation.All.Vatican Council II here supports the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation.So all Jews and Muslims in 2017 are on the way to Hell without 'faith and baptism' according to Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) and EENS(Feeneyite).

This negates the position of Hans Urs von Balthasar, Bishop Barron, Dr.Ralph Martin and the faculty at the Sacred Heart Seminary,  Michael Voris and the staff at Church Militant TV.

It negates the position of the Vatican Curia and the two popes, that of the Archbbishop of Detroit and the Jewish Left(ADL etc).

So when will  CMTV comment on this ? Can they really comment on this when they often mention the issue of salvation?

-Lionel Andrades