Conference speakers and others can still now, ' one year after Amoris Laetitia' , 'seek clarity' on the heretical statement of Pope Benedict last March 2016.

"Seeing Clarity: One year after Amoris Laetitia."This was the subject of the conference  on April 22, 2017  in Rome.It was addressed by six Catholic laypersons.Amoris Laetitia undermines the Church's magisterial teaching on  adultery, mortal sin and the Holy Eucharist.1

______________________

Wednesday, March 16, 2016

Pope Benedict Breaks Silence and Affirms the Thrice Defined, Infallible Dogma, No Salvation Outside of the Catholic Church

"Council Cast Church and Faithful into a Double Crisis"  - Interview of Benedict XVI

(Rome) Pope Benedict XVI. has broken his silence that he  undertook in connection with his unexpected resignation. Since 2013 he has lived in retirement in the convent, Mater Ecclesiae in the Vatican. Now has given  Avvenire, the daily newspaper of the Italian Bishops' Conference a long interview, which was published in today's issue.

_________________________________

The six speakers did not say it.One year earlier in March 2016 Pope Benedict XVI undermined the Church's teachings on faith and salvation.He did not interpret the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with the traditional and common sense theology of Feeneyism.Instead he chose an irrational and innovative Cushingite theology.It made the dogma EENS a rupture with Vatican Council II. So for the pope and the CDF, there is no Vatican Council II and EENS , Feeneyite.Instead there is  something new.It is Vatican Council II and EENS, Cushingite.

So the Nicene Creed and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Catechism of Pope Pius X,Catechism of the Council of Trent, Baltimore Catechism and other catechisms would have to be re-interpreted. They would be re-interpreted with hypothetical cases not being hypothetical.Invisible baptism of desire would be considered physically visible.Any reference to being saved in invincible ignorance would be a reference to a personally known case to someone.

Personally not identified cases of people allegedly being saved without the baptism of water in the past centuries would be postulated as explicit exceptions to the dogma EENS in the present times (2017).So St. Emerentiana and St. Victor of the past would be objective exceptions to all needing to be members of the Catholic Church in the present times (2917).Irrational' Fantasy theology? Yes but it is magisterial. Pope Benedict said so in public. 

The inference of the two popes now is that not every one in the present times needs to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation.This was the past ecclesiology of the Church.

Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reaoning which says there are no known exceptions past or present, to the dogma EENS.There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.
 Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning, which assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.

 

 

I, however, continue to interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism. So there is no 'development of the dogma' for me.I accept all magisterial documents but unlike Pope Benedict XVI, I interpret them with Feeneyism.Our premises and conclusions are difference. Our faith and reason are also different.

 

For me Pope Benedict's  Avvenire interview was heresy.He did not as a pope and a Catholic affirm the dogma EENS and Vatican Council II with a rational theology.It was like when he once said that Jews do not have to convert into the Catholic Church during the present times but at the end of time, eschatological time.This was when he revised the revised Good Friday Prayer for the Conversion of the Jews.This too was heresy. He rejected the dogma EENS ( Feeneyite) and also Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).

Was this not heresy for the conference speakers?.The pope's was irrational.So his conclusion was non traditional. It was a rupture with the past and he boldly expressed it in public.

He interpreted EENS and Vatican Council II with the hermeneutic of rupture and got away with it. No one protested. It was not even briefly mentioned on April 22 at the conference in Rome when a pope being in heresy was an issue.

Pope Benedict could have interpreted EENS, Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(first part) with Feeneyism and- he  chose not to do so.

The four cardinals who issued the dubbia on Amoris Laetitia said nothing. Since they too are Cushingites.

The SSPX and the sedevacantists said nothing on this issue. Since for them too Cushingite Vatican Council II is a rupture with EENS Feeneyite.They have no concept of a Feeneyite Vatican Council II being in harmony with a Feeneyite EENS.
 

Pope Benedict is in heresy on a de fide teaching of the Church.There is a rupture between his faith and reason.He may say that he accepts the dogma EENS but he refers to a Cushingite EENS.This is a new doctrine.It is  a rupture with the dogma EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century. He frankly disclosed this in public.

He was saying that his magisterium contradicted the magisterium of the 16th century.Is this not heresy? Boldly and bluntly he said this and no one in March 2016 asked if a pope can be in heresy and reject an infallible teaching of the past.Probably the conference speakers are doing the same thing.

So the ecclesiology of the Church has been changed for him.It is different before and after Vatican Council II.This is what he said.The 16th century ecclesiology based on Feeneyite EENS has been discarded.It was done with the Rahner-Ratzinger new theology.This is the theology used at SSPX seminaries.They support an EENS and Vatican Council II, Cushingite.

Bishop Bernard Fellay does not tell Pope Benedict to interpret Church documents with Feeneyism( invisible cases are not visible) and then the ecclesiology in the present times,would be the same as in the past.

Instead when he made his announcement in March 2016 Church Militant, the blog The Eponymous Flower and others were praising him for 'breaking his silence'.They thought that the pope affirmed the dogma when he did not.

The conference speakers and others can still now, ' One year after Amoris Laetitia' , 'seek clarity' on the heretical statement of Pope Benedict last March 2016.-Lionel Andrades

 

1.

http://voxcantor.blogspot.it/2017/04/the-challenge-to-pope-francis-and_26.html


________________________________________________________



Video :NEWS NBQ17
https://youtu.be/YO7Vhvy9lUg

TERMS EXPLAINED

A Feeneyite does not separate the baptism of water from the baptism of desire.The baptism of desire will be followed by the baptism of water. A Cushingite separates the baptism of water from the baptism of desire. The baptism of desire excludes the baptism of water.  I interpret the following terms with Feeneyism and the two popes and the cardinals do so with Cushingism (so does the SSPX).
I use Feeneyism and Pope Benedict XVI, Cardinal Muller, Bishop Bernard Fellay, Bishop Mark Pirvanus, Bishop Donald Sanborn and the sedevacantists Michael and Peter Dimond use Cushingism.For me the Baptism of Desire is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.For me Invincible Ignorance is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.For me Vatican Council II is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.  For me Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.For the Dimond Brothers extra ecclesiam nulla salus is Feeneyite but they reject the baptism of desire which is Cushingite for them. For me the Nicene Creed is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite. 

For me the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston is Feeneyite (in the first half) and for them it is Cushingite.

I avoid the New Theology, while they uses it. 

For me the Catechism of the Catholic Church is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite. 

The present magisterium separates the baptism of water from the baptism of desire. The baptism of desire excludes the baptism of water.I do not do so.

Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reaoning which says there are no known exceptions past or present, to the dogma EENS.There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS. 

Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning, which assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle hypothetical cases are objective in the present times. 

Baptism of Desire (Feeneyite): It refers to the hypothetical case of an unknown catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is an invisible case in our reality it is not relevant to the dogma EENS. 

Baptism of Desire (Cushingite): It refers to the known case of a catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is a visible case or the SSPX it is relevant to the dogma EENS. 

Invincible Ignorance ( Feeneyite): This refers to the hypothetical case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance. 

Invincible Ignorance (Cushingite): This refers to the explicit case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance.Since it is an exception to the dogma EENS it is assumed to be objectively known in particular cases.This reasoning is irrational. 

Council of Florence: One of the three Councils which defined the dogma EENS.It did not mention any exceptions.It did not mention the baptism of desire. It was Feeneyite.

Liberal theologians: They reinterpreted the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, as objective cases, known in the present times.They use Cushingism.

Vatican Council II (Cushingite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Cushingism.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer not to hypothetical but known cases in the present times. So Vatican Council II emerges as a break with the dogma EENS. 

Vatican Council II (Feeneyite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to hypothetical cases, which are unknown personally in the present times.So Vatican Council II is not a break with EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return, the Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite-one baptism),the teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the non separation of Church and State( since all need to convert into the Church to avoid Hell). 

Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston: It assumed hypothetical cases were defacto known in the present times. So it presented the baptism of desire etc as an explicit exception, to the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS.It censured Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center.Since they did not assume that the baptism of desire referred to a visible instead of invisible case.The Letter made the baptism of desire etc relevant to EENs.From the second part of this Letter has emerged the New Theology.It was Cushingite. 

Letter of the Holy Office 1949 ( Feeneyite): It means accepting the Letter as Feeneyite based on the first part,only .It supports Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.The traditional interpretatiion of the dogma EENS does not mention any exceptions. 

Letter of the Holy Office ( Cushingite): It is based on the second part of the Letter.It rejects the traditional interpretation of EENS. Since it considers the baptism of desire ( Cushingite-explicit) and being saved in invincible ignorance ( Cushingite-explicit cases) as being exceptions to EENS ( Feeneyite).It worngly assumes hypothetical cases are objectively visible and so they are exceptions to the first part of the Letter. 

Baltimore Catechism: It assumed that the desire for the baptism of an unknown catechumen, who dies before receiving it and was saved, was a baptism like the baptism of water. So it was placed in the Baptism Section of the catechism. In other words it was wrongly assumed that the baptism of desire is visible and repeatable like the baptism of water or that we can administer it like the baptism of water.The Baltimore Catechism is accepted with the confusion.It can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism.

Catechism of Pope X: It followed the Baltimore Catechism and placed the baptism of desire in the Baptism Section.It can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism.

Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite): It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins and means there is one known baptism the baptism of water.It is Feeneyite.

Nicene Creed ( Cushingite) : It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' and means there are more than three known baptisms. They are water, blood, desire, seeds of the Word etc.This is a Cushingite interpretation. 

New Theology: It refers to the new theology in the Catholic Church based on hypothetical cases being objective in the present times.So it eliminates the dogma EENS.With the dogma EENS made obsolete the ecclesiology of the Church changes. There is a new ecclesiology which is a break with Tradition.It's basis is Cushingism.

Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Feeneyite): It refers to the dogma as it was interpreted over the centuries.There are no known exceptions to all needing to formally enter the Church, with faith and baptism, to avoid Hell. 

 

Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Cushingite): CCC 1257 contradicts the Principle of Non Contraduction. Also CCC 848 is based on the new theology and so is a rupture with the dogma EENS( Feeneyite). 

Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Cushingite): It refers to the dogma but with exceptions.All do not need to defacto convert into the Church in the present times, since there are exceptions. 

Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Feeneyite): CCC 1257 does not contradict the Principle of Non Contradiction since there are no known exceptions to all needing the baptism of water for salvation. There are no known exceptions, since God is not limited to the Sacraments. 

When CCC 846 states all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church,CCC 846 does not contradict the dogmatic teaching on all needin to formally enter the Church. CCC 846 does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 which states all need faith and baptism for salvation.

Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Cushingite): CCC 1257 contradicts the Principle of Non Contraduction. Also CCC 848 is based on the new theology and so is a rupture with the dogma EENS( Feeneyite).

Council of Trent : A Feeneyite does not separate the baptism of water from the baptism of desire.The baptism of desire will be followed by the baptism of water.

Council of Trent : A Cushingite separates the baptism of water from the baptism of desire. The baptism of desire excludes the baptism of water.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/i-am-not-denying-baptism-of.html

________________________

April 18, 2017

Boston Heresy of the magisterium has practical consequences today : Abp.Corrado Lorefice interprets Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingism instead of traditional Feeneyism 

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/boston-heresy-of-magisterium-has.html

_____________________________________

April 16, 2017

The people of Palermo must ask for a replacement.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/the-people-of-palermo-must-ask-for.html

Marching on in March -3

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/marching-on-in-march-3.html