Chartres pilgrims do not know about Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) : Cardinal Burke will not tell them about it

In a previous post I mentioned that Fr.Nicholas Gruner did not know about Vatican Council II (Feeneyite). He did not know that with Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) the Council supported the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and the Syllabus of Errors.

Similarly Chris Ferrara when he wrote his book The Great Facade he did not know that by switiching the interpretation of the baptism of desire(BOD) for example, you can get a completely different interpretation of EENS. BOD can be interpreted as being visible or invisible, explicit or implicit and the interpretation of the Council is one of continuity or rupture with the past magisterium.
Similarly when Ralph Martin wrote his books on evangelisation and salvation he did not know that Vatican Council II was Feeneyite and that his interpretation of the Council was irrational and Cushingite.

It means all these 50 years every one had the wrong interpretation of Vatican Council II.They were using the irrational premise. They assumed invisible for us baptism of desire was explicit. They also concluded that BOD excluded the baptism of water in the Church.So BOD and invincible ignorance (I.I),in LG 16, AG 7, LG 14 etc were explicit exceptions to Tradition for them. They wrongly placed the fault on Vatican Council II when the fault was really their premise, visible or invisible BOD and I.I.
Similarly those who attend the Chartres pilgrimage annually would be in general rejecting Vatican Council II and would not know of Vatican Council II( Feeneyite).Cardinal Raymond Burke if he does know about Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) will he affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was interpreted by the missionaries of the 16th century? Is he going to say that he was wrong about the Council which really is in harmony with EENS ( Feeneyite)? Will he say that there are no known exceptions to EENS (Feeneyite) mentioned in the text of Vatican Council II ?
Can all those who attend the Chartres Pilgrimage say this?It has been difficult all these years for the St. Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary and the supporters of the St.Benedict Centers who are there at Chartres. It has been difficult for Michael Matt.
Prof.Joseph Shaw who teaches at Oxford University will affirm that all non Catholics in 2017 are on the way to Hell according to Vatican Council II (Feeneyite)?
Is he going to tell Una Voce and Ecclesia Dei that Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) is not a rupture with the dogma EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century and so Pope Benedict XVI made a mistake with his announcement in March 2016 (Avvenire)?
It is easier to criticize Vatican Council II without making the distinction between Vatican Council II, Cushingite and Feeneyite.It is not so easy to affirm Vatican Council II, Feeneyite because of the persecution which will follow from the Left.
After so many of these reports on the Internet over the last few years on Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) Rorate Caeili, the other day, posted another re-hashed version of a Vatican Council II analysis interpreted with Cushingism. They were loyal to Pope Benedict, Pope Francis, the liberals and the Left. But what if they posted a report in support of Vatican Council II (Feeneyite)? The phone calls

would ring and Rorate Caeili would be threathened. So at Rorate Caeili they act as if they do not understand any other interpretation of the Council, other then the one approved for them and the Church, by the Left.
This is also the general understanding at the Chartres Pilgrimage.Do you think that Chris Ferrara and Michael Matt will be comfortable affirming Vatican Council II and EENS Feeneyite? Do you think Bishop Sanborn who has a seminary in Florida and meets the state and academic requirements will announce that Vatican Council II (AG 7) says all Jews, Muslims, Protestants are on the way to Hell without 'faith and baptism'? Will he say that Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) is not a rupture with EENS ( Feeneyite) which has the same message?
Will he ? It is much easier, safer and prudent to criticize Vatican Council IIin order to make a living or live comfortable in the USA and Europe.
So simply offering the Traditional Latin Mass at Chartres is meaningless in the sense that the ecclesiology of the Mass supports EENS and Vatican Council II ( Cushingite). Summorum Pontificum was offered with the condition that the theology would be based on invisible baptism of desire being a visible exceptions to the dogma EENS( Feeneyite).Nothing new. Same old heresy.
Archbishop Lefebvre was excommunicated since he could not accept Vatican Council II (Cushingism). No one told him about Vatican Council II (Feeneyite).The SSPX General Chapter Doctrinal Statement of 2012 was rejected by the CDF and Ecclesia Dei since it affirmed EENS and Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) in an indirect way. It said every one needs to enter the Church for salvation and there are no possibilities of salvation outside the Church.
It is easy to attend the Old Mass at Chartres and it can be enjoyable walking but when you come back home it is not so easy to affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and EENS ( Feeneyite).-Lionel Andrades