Professors of Philosophy at Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit have to teach irrational philosophy and heretical theology since it is magisterial

Dr.Eduardo J.Echeverria is a professor of Philosophy and Theology at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary and his publications include 'Pope Francis and the Legacy of Vatican Council II'. He means Vatican Council II interpreted with the irrational premise.This is the only Vatican Council II he knows. 

Victor and Elizabeth Sales, Associate Professors of Philosophy at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary Detroit, are in a philosophical soup too, ends don't tie up and they have to project confusion and irrationality as being Catholic philosophy.

Their reasoning is wrong and their philosophy is bad when they teach students that Vatican Council II is a rupture with  Tradition. They infer like the traditionalists that LG 16, LG 8, LG 14, AG 7, UR 3, GS 22, etc refer to concrete, known cases saved outside the Church.This is how the Archdiocese interprets the Council.

The motto of the Detroit seminary is 'forming Hearts and Minds. Proclaiming Jesus Christ'.They mean, with bad philosophy and theology they form hearts and minds and they proclaim Jesus Christ, without the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church for salvation.

So there is known salvation outside the Church for  Eduardo J.Echeverria and  Victor and Elizabeth Sales as a result of their  bad reasoning.This is bad philosophy and it is not Catholic. It is objectively wrong and so cannot be the teaching of the Holy Spirit.

Forming Hearts and Minds. 

Proclaiming Jesus Christ.

With a foundation in bad philosophy they prepare Catholic students at the seminary to receive the bad theology they have personally received.

They have to teach irrational philosophy and heretical theology since it is magisterial.

So when I send them these blog posts they do not comment  since even though their  philosophy and theology is deceptive and the teaching dishonest they have to go through with it.

They give students a foundation in irrational reasoning, with the help of a false premise, which 'forms hearts and minds', to accept an innovative and new theology, which makes Vatican Council II a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

The two Associate Professors have to violate Aristotle's Principle of Non Contradiction in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston.

How can people in Heaven, allegedly saved with the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) be objective exceptions on earth to all needing to be formal members of the Catholic Church for salvation?

Would these professors of Philosophy be able to state as simple Catholics that they believe that the present reasoning in philosophy and theology at Sacred Heart Seminary  is not the work of the Holy Spirit. So they personally affirm all magisterial documents without the irrational premise which created the non traditional conclusion?

1.They could state instead, that they as professors of Philosophy at Sacred Heart Major Seminary affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the magisterium and missionaries in the 16 th century for example.

2.They affirm Vatican Council II without the irrational premise and so the Council is in harmony with the dogma EENS as it was known over the centuries.They reject Vatican Council II as a rupture with the old ecclesiology of the Church.

3.They affirm the Nicene Creed and understand that it means, we Catholics believe in only one known baptism for the forgiveness of sins and it is only the baptism of water. There are no known cases of the baptism of desire, blood and invincible ignorance, with or without the baptism of water.'

4.They could affirm the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994) and interpret it with BOD, BOB and I.I as referring to only hypothetical cases. They cannot be anything else.So there is nothing in the Catechism of the Catholic Church to contradict the dogma EENS as it was known over the centuries.

5.They could affirm the first past of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which is traditional and they could reject the second part of the Letter, which contradicts the first part by making a philosophical error ;  by assuming BOD,BOB and I.I refer to visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.

These five points would help them not violate the Principle of Non Contradiction in their teaching and personal beliefs as Catholics.

I have also asked Dr.Phillip Blosser, a professor of Philosophy at this seminary to affirm these five points as a Catholic, as I do, and I am waiting for his reply.

-Lionel Andrades

The One True Faith Revisited — Where Did the Bible Come From?

Church Militant ha condiviso un link.

The One True Faith Revisited — Where Did the Bible Come From?

Revisiting the digitally remastered third season of our flagship show

CHURCHMILITANT.COM

https://www.churchmilitant.com/video/episode/download-the-one-true-faith-revisited-where-did-the-bible-come-from

Rev. Msgr. Todd J. Lajiness, Rector and President of the Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit agrees with professors Ralph Martin, Robert Fastiggi and Phillip Blosser : no physically visible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I

Rev. Msgr. Todd J. Lajiness, Rector and President of the Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit agrees with professors Ralph Martin, Robert Fastiggi and Phillip Blosser - there are no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood (BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I) in 2017.

He is confirming what is common knowledge for us human beings.Invisible people cannot be visible at the same time.People in Heaven are generally not visible on earth to the mass of people in 2017.They would be known only to God.

I have been sending Msgr. Lajiness and the faculty members these blog posts and no one has disagreed with me or correct an error in anything I have written.

No one, as expected, has said that people in Heaven are visible on earth or that we can see the dead, who are now in Heaven, saved with BOD, BOB and I.I.It is obvious that we humans cannot meet on earth someone who is in Heaven allegedly saved with the BOD, BOB and I.I.

Neither can we say that any particular person in 2017 will be going to Heaven without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church and instead will be saved with BOD, BOB and I.I.

So there is no denial, correction or clarification from Msgr.Todd J. Lajiness  who has completed a Licentiate in Philosophy at the Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas(Angelicum), Rome in 2000.He also earned a Doctorate in Philosophy from the Angelicum in 2002.

According to his bio data on the seminary website the young Rector's professional activities include being a member of the Board of Commissioners for the Association of Theological Schools and also working in close collaboration with ATS on accreditation visits to seminaries throughout the USA.Additionally, he serves as the President of the National Association of Catholic Schools.

I don't expect him to say anything extraordinary like - there is a dead man seen walking on the streets of Detroit saved without the baptism of water.

It may be mentioned that the new Rector of the Pontifical University of St.Anselm, Rome, Fr.Stefano Visintini osb, has said that there are no known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I and so they are not objective exceptions to the centuries old interpretation of the dogma EENS. They do not contradict EENS as it was known to St. Benedict.

Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson has the same message and a few years back he called upon the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) to accept Vatican Council II. He would be referring to Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite), the interpretation which does not mix up hypothetical cases as being objectively seen in the present times.So LG 16, LG 14, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, AG 7, AG 11 etc being theoretical and hypothetical would not contradict the dogma EENS and the old ecclesiology of the Church.There would be no break with the Syllabus of Errors.

THE PROBLEM

But even though all of us agree that there are no known exceptions to the dogma EENS and that  BOD, BOB and I.I are not objective to be exceptions, while Lumen Gentium 16 ( invincible ingnorance) would also not be a rupture with the dogma EENS, since it refers to a hypothetical case, there still is a problem.It's a big problem.

THEY HAVE TO TEACH IRRATIONAL REASONING

The problem is that professors Ralph Martin and Robert Fastiggi would agree with us here too, invisible people cannot be visible exceptions to EENS, however when they  teach theology they affirm Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition.It is a rupture with Feeneyite  EENS and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX. 
Since they infer that Lumen Gentium 16 etc refer to non- hypothetical cases, which are explicit exceptions to the dogma EENS, as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.

THEOLOGY- DEGREES  GIVEN TO THOSE WHO ACCEPT IRRATIONALITY

So they approve of academic degrees in theology being given to those who interpret Vatican Council II  with the irrationality( invisible cases are  visible exceptions to traditional EENS).This is irrational and non traditional and is also approved by Msgr.Todd J. Lajiness

EXAMPLES OF SACRED HEART SEMINARY HERESY

1. The faculty have changed the interpretation of the dogma EENS or rejected it. This is heresy.

2. They are not interpreting and affirming Vatican Council II without the irrationality. Then the Council would be in harmony with traditional EENS. This is again heresy.

3. They interpret the Nicene Creed with the same irrationality and so the understanding of the Nicene Creed changes. This is first class heresy. For me it is 'I believe in one known baptism for the forgiveness of sins, it is the baptism of water'. For the seminary faculty it is 'I believe in three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins, desire, blood,invincible ignorance, seeds of the word etc, and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.'

RUPTURE WITH THE PAST MAGISTERIUM

So with the confusion created by their philosophical reasoning, they profess and teach a new irrational and non traditional theology which results in new doctrines which are accepted by the magisterium but are heretical. They are a rupture with the past magisterium of the Catholic Church.

THEY COULD AFFIRM THE FAITH WITHOUT THE IRRATIONALITY

They could simply state that as Catholics, they believe that the present reasoning in philosophy and theology is not the work of the Holy Spirit. So they affirm all magisterial documents without the irrational premise which created the non traditional conclusion.
1.They could state instead, that they affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the magisterium and missionaries in the 16 th century for example.

2.They affirm Vatican Council II without the irrational premise and so the Council is in harmony with the dogma EENS as it was known over the centuries.They reject Vatican Council II as a rupture with the old ecclesiology of the Church.

3.They affirm the Nicene Creed and understand that it means, we Catholics believe in only one known baptism for the forgiveness of sins and it is only the baptism of water. There are no known cases of the baptism of desire, blood and invincible ignorance, with or without the baptism of water.'

4.They could affirm the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994) and interpret it with BOD, BOB and I.I as referring to only hypothetical cases. They cannot be anything else.So there is nothing in the Catechism of the Catholic Church to contradict the dogma EENS as it was known over the centuries.

5.They could affirm the first past of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which is traditional and they could reject the second part of the Letter, which contradicts the first part by assuming BOD,BOB and I.I refer to visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.-Lionel Andrades