Saturday, February 17, 2018

6- To reinterpret Vatican Council II and switch from Cushingism to Feeneyism review your understanding of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949

APRIL 12, 2017

Letter of the Holy Office 1949 teaches anathema contradicts Jesus' teaching in John 3:5 and the Council of Trent http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/letter-of-holy-office-1949-teaches.html

 
OCTOBER 13, 2016 An error was made in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and much of the Vatican Council II theology is based on this error.This is what I know  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/an-error-was-made-in-letter-of-holy.html
JANUARY 18, 2016 Archbishop Lefebvre did not see the same wrong reasoning, as the inference in the Letter(1949) used in Vatican Council II.The SSPX has still not noticed this !!! http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/01/archbishop-lefebvre-accepted-inference.html
JANUARY 7, 2016 Letter of the Holy Office 1949 : from meaningless non applicable theology to heresy http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/01/letter-of-holy-office-1949-from.html
DECEMBER 30, 2015 The Letter made a mistake. Archbishop Lefebvre did not notice it. ttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/12/the-letter-made-mistakearchbishop.html
MARCH 14, 2015
After 1949 the error came in a big way into the Catholic Church http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/after-1949-error-came-in-big-way-into.html







T raditionalists reject Vatican Council II with heresy and accept the Letter of the Holy Office with heresy. They do not see how the two are connected http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/traditionalists-reject-vatican-council.html#links

FEBRUARY 13, 2015

Bishop Schneider uses the common Gnostic interpretation of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II


FEBRUARY 13, 2015

In itself the baptism of desire is not a problem. It is when it is considered an exception to the dogma that the error arises


 
The baptism of desire is accepted by me since it is not an exception to the dogma even when it occurs and it is known only to God http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/the-baptism-of-desire-is-accepted-by-me.html
The lawful authorities were saying that there were exceptions to the strict interpretation of the dogma http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/i-have-received-e-mail-today.html

JULY 28, 2017

So objectively there were no exceptions to Feeneyite EENS and the so Letter of the Holy Office was a classic 'oops'.

SEPTEMBER 13, 2017

Lay Catholics must reject the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office conclusion : expedient religious are teaching it in Catechism classes


APRIL 12, 2017

Let Holy Office 1949 and the Archbishop of Boston be anathema?They were teaching heresy. There are no known cases of the baptism of desire and they postulated exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

JANUARY 25, 2017

Cardinal Richard Cushing and Nostra Aetate picked up the objective error from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949

OCTOBER 10, 2016
The Letter of the Holy Office says that it is not required that a person be incorporated into the Church as a member for salvation while the Catechism of Pius X says it is necessary. http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/the-letter-of-holy-office-says-that-it.html
-Lionel Andrades


February 15, 2018
 5- To re-interpret Vatican Council II and switch from Cushingism to Feeneyism as a theology review your understanding of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/to-re-interpret-vatican-council-ii-and_15.html
February 15, 2018
1-5 : To re-interpret Vatican Council II and switch from Cushingism to Feeneyism as a theology review your understanding of the Letter of the Holy Office (1949) 1-5
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/to-re-interpret-vatican-council-ii-and_82.html

No comments: