Monday, May 21, 2018

Pope Benedict XVI and Bishop Robert Barron use a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with extra ecclesiam nulla salus : then they call for mission based on beauty

Bishop Robert Barron has put aside the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). He uses a  false premise to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS.Since EENS is obsolete for him he cannot call for the traditional evangelisation based on the dogma EENS.He has to seek new reasons for evangelisation. He cannot say all non Catholics, Christians included, are on the way to Hell in general,according to Vatican Council II (Ad Gentes 7- all need faith and baptism for salvation).He knows most people die without Catholic faith.So he calls for evangelisation based on beauty or goodness.

BISHOP BARRON CONFUSES WHAT IS IMPLICIT AS EXPLICIT, INVISIBLE AS VISIBLE
 His fault is mixing up what is invisible as being visible, what is implicit as being explicit. He assumes invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are not invisible but physically visible. Then he infers that these  visible and known people are saved outside the Catholic Church.He then  concludes that this is an exception to all needing to formally enter the Catholic Church as a member.Why? Since there are known examples of salvation outside the Church for him. So the dogma EENS becomes obsolete for him. It is contradicted by Vatican Council II ( LG  16 etc).He confuses unknown people saved in invincible ignorance and without Catholic faith as being as being visible and personally known. This irrationality is very important for his New Theology. So only with this false premise can Vatican Council II can be interpreted as being a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiolgy.
The past ecclesiology was a motivation over the centuries, for mission.
Similarly with the same false premise Pope Benedict interprets Vatican Council II as ' a development' of EENS.He said that the dogma EENS today is no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century( March 2016 Avvenire).
Pope Benedict used the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS and the past exclusivist eclesiology, which motivated the Jesuits to go to distant lands on mission in the 16th century.They knew that all the natives in China and India were on the way to Hell in general and that they could not know of any exceptions if there were any.
But for Cardinal Ratzinger LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc also refer to exceptions to EENS. EENS is obsolete for him. He calls EENS an 'aphorism' in the Catechism and an 'adage' in one of the papers of the International Theological Commission.
So Cardinal Ratzinger called for mission based on the beautiful face of Jesus.

CARDINAL ANGELO AMATO CALLS FOR TRADITIONAL MISSION BASED ON VATICAN COUNCIL II
Cardinal Angelo Amato however called for evangelisation based on Vatican Council II ( AG 7, LG 14) which says all need faith and baptism for salvation. I had been sending him my e-mails. This would be an evangelisation based on truth. It would be Biblical(John 3:5, 16:16), traditional ( Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441) and post Vatican Council II( CCC 845,846,1257 etc), Ecclesia di Eucarestia etc.-Lionel Andrades 


MAY 20, 2018


Mission Motivation : The Catholic Faith - 1- 3  

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/the-catholic-faith-1-3.html

No comments: