Comment:
I am sorry but tell me again or show me where the fssp and society of Pope Pius X made a mistake on this doctrine.
Lionel :
Here they are...., you can find them on the SSPX website, listed below in red.
We now know that there is only one known and visible baptism for us human beings.No one has seen salvation outside the Church.No one knows of any one saved with the baptism of desire in particular in Heaven.Someone allegedly saved with the baptism of desire or baptism of blood in the past cannot be an objective exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) in the present times(2018). For there to be an exception there would have to be a known person saved outside the Church in the present times.He or she could then be cited as an example of salvation outside the Church.
So the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) never ever were exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.The liberal theologians made a mistake or faked it, in 1949 and then in 1960-1965 and in the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994).
We can only accept BOD,BOB and I.I as speculative and hypothetical cases, possibillities for us human beings which can only be known to God in a concrete way.
So the Society of St. Pius X has made a mistake in the following reports on their official website.This is the error of the FSSP and also the sedevacantists influenced by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.
The three baptisms
Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer
Originally in the March 1998 issue of The Angelus magazine.
The three errors of the Feeneyites http://archives.sspx.org/misce Fr. Feeney and Catholic doctrine http://archives.sspx.org/misce Against the Heresies by Archbishop LefebvreOpen Letter to Confused Catholics by Archbishop LefebvreBaptism of Desire by Fr. John-Marc RulleauIs Feeneyism Catholic? by Fr. Francois Laisney
-Lionel Andrades
___________________________________________ NOVEMBER 8, 2017NOVEMBER 11, 2017No denial from SSPX : Books of Archbishop Lefebvre are obsolete now : so are the writings on Vatican Council II by Chris Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/no-denial-books-of-archbishop-lefebvre.html
NOVEMBER 11, 2017SSPX continues to calumniate Fr. Leonard Feeney : doctrinal ignorance prevents them from using Catholic churches on Sunday.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/sspx-continues-to-calumniate-fr-leonard.html
JANUARY 18, 2018St.Benedict Centers could affirm Vatican Council II with Feeneyite theology and the SSPX could affirm Vatican Council II and EENS with Feeneyite and not Cushingite theology http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/01/stbenedict-centers-could-affirm-vatican.htmlJANUARY 7, 2018Catholics at large who discern must help the SSPX members to understand http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/01/catholics-at-large-who-discern-must.htmlAUGUST 19, 2016No denial from the SSPX: dogmas and doctrine changed
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/08/no-denial-from-sspx-dogmas-and-doctrine.html
MAY 20, 2016SSPX is in doctrinal error like the contemporary magisterium Steve Skojec
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/05/sspx-is-in-doctrinal-error-like.html
JANUARY 12, 2016Doctrinal error within the SSPX too ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/01/doctrinal-error-within-sspx-too.html
JANUARY 12, 2016Pope Pius XII, Cardinals Ottaviani, Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre were factually wrong
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/01/pope-pius-xii-cardinals.html
JANUARY 3, 2018
The SSPX bishops like Archbishop Lefebvre interpret Vatican Council II(LG 16 etc) as a rupture with EENS and so they reject Vatican Council II.So the Vatican Council II which they understand, is always a rupture with EENS
|